Skip to main content
· 10/28/1986

Dearing v. Perry

Citations

  • 499 N.E.2d 268
  • 1986 Ind. App. LEXIS 3077

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that although loss of consortium is a derivative action, it is separate and independent from the primary action and therefore exempt from the employer's compensation lien
  • holding that a $16,000 allocation for loss of consortium, in light of the $50,000 total award to the employee and his wife, was improper where insurer had no opportunity to negotiate the allocation
  • invalidating provision in settlement agreement allocating réimbursable and nonreimbursable damages where workers’ compensation carrier had no opportunity to participate in settlement; carrier is entitled to decision on allocation by impartial factfinder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ratliff, Robertson, Neal

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.