Dearborn v. Great Southern Financial Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting fraudulent-concealment defense to limitations in part because there was no evidence that plaintiffs relied on reports on which defense was premised
• explaining defendant seeking summary judgment bore burden to establish that claims accrued “outside the limitations period”
• concluding fraudulent concealment doctrine did not toll limitations period on ranch owners’ claim of surface contamination against petroleum company where there was no evidence of, among other things, misconduct on company’s part with respect to spills on property or at abandoned sites
• \The doctrine of fraudulent concealment tolls the statute of limitations until the fraud is discovered or could have been discovered with due diligence.\
• \The doctrine of fraudulent concealment tolls the statute of limitations until the fraud is discovered or could have been discovered with due diligence.\
• “The doctrine of fraudulent concealment tolls the statute of limitations until the fraud is discovered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).