Deanna Turner v. The Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the FHA’s private cause of action against the alleged perpetrator of discriminatory practices provided the plaintiff with an adequate remedy, thus precluding judicial review under the APA
• noting that the FHA “authorizes private suits directly against perpetrators of allegedly discriminatory practices, even if, as here, HUD renders a determination that there was no reasonable cause to believe that there had been discrimination”
• reaffirming decision below that section 813 of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) provided plaintiff with another adequate remedy barring judicial review under the APA
• agency actions are reviewable if they are “made reviewable by statute” or if there was a “final agency action for which there is no other adequate remedy in a court”
• \[a] legal remedy is not inadequate for purposes of the APA because it is procedurally inconvenient for a given plaintiff.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).