DEANNA B. BARRINGTON AND JOHN E. BARRINGTON v. MARSHALL D'SOUZA AND LORETTA D'SOUZA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “even if [the defendant] was entitled to have the BIA consider his section 212(c
• Motz., J., concurring in the judgment (quoting 140 cong. Rec. S.14544 (daily ed. Oct. 6, 1994)), overruled on other grounds by Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47 (2006

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).