Deana Pollard Sacks v. Brian Weil Zimmerman and Andrew Todd McKinney, IV

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that if the plaintiff “had any evidence that opposing counsel were abusing the discovery process, discovery sanctions would be available to her” but that opposing counsel were nonetheless entitled to immunity
• holding that if Sacks “had any evidence that opposing counsel were abusing the discovery process, discovery sanctions would be available to her” but that Zimmerman and McKinney were nonetheless entitled to immunity
• explaining contours of litigation privilege in invasion of privacy suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).