Dean v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[requiring consent to such a search as a condition of parole is not unreasonable”
• requiring consent to a search as a condition of parole is not unreasonable
• it is not unreasonable to require that a parolee consent to a warrantless search as a condition of parole

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Luke v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1986-03-21· cited 24×
• State v. Cauley
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-11-01· cited 13×
• Howard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-09-23· cited 9×
• Thomas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-08-09· cited 7×
• Dearth v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-11-05· cited 7×
• BURKES v. the STATE.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-10-25· cited 4×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hunter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-09-28· cited 20×
• Austin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1979-01-25· cited 12×
• People v. Turner
  California Court of Appeal· 1976-01-19· cited 12×