Skip to main content
· 2/24/2003

Dean v. Muscatine County

Citations

  • 250 F. Supp. 2d 1094
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3744
  • 2003 WL 1227956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking plaintiffs additional evidence in a similar circumstance, noting “[cjounsel’s untimely submission is highly prejudicial to defendants, who were then forced to submit a hurried response to plaintiffs supplement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Longstaff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.