Skip to main content
· 12/28/2006

Dean v. Global Financial Credit, LLC (In Re Dean)

Citations

  • 359 B.R. 218
  • 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3692
  • 2006 WL 3833930

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that allegations of actual and punitive damages for violation of an automatic stay are “sufficient to bring the claims within the purview of [an adversary proceeding under] Rule 7001(1)”
  • collecting cases and noting that “[s]everal courts have held that if a party seeks recovery of damages . . . this falls within Rule 7001(1) and the matter should be brought as an adversary proceeding”
  • “Several courts have held that if a party seeks recovery of damages . . . this falls within Rule 7001(1) and the matter should be brought as an adversary proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: William v. Altenberger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.