· 9/28/2005
Dean v. Federal Deposit Insurance
Citations
- 389 F. Supp. 2d 780
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22701
- 2005 WL 2403736
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]o the extent that the defendants have redacted the ‘name, address, and other identifying information’ of the plaintiff himself in these documents . . . , reliance on Exemption 6 or 7(C) would be improper.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Forester
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.