Skip to main content
· 4/19/2002

Dean v. Dearing

Citations

  • 561 S.E.2d 686
  • 263 Va. 485
  • 30 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1698
  • 2002 Va. LEXIS 59

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that mere conclusory statements “do[ ] not satisfy the pleading requirement” necessary to withstand a demurrer
  • noting “only one case in Virginia [] has dealt directly with the issue of small group defamation since Ewell v. Boutwell.”
  • rejecting the defamation claim of an individual officer because the defendant’s accusations neither referenced the plaintiff nor could be understood to have specifically implicated him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lacy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.