Dean v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prosecutor’s release of the witness was not prejudicial because the defendant could have subpoenaed the witness
• alteration in 14 “The determination on a chain of custody challenge lies [also] within the [circuit] court’s broad discretion and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion.” Pope v. Commonwealth, 60 Va. App. 486, 511 (2012). -8- original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Anderson v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2001-09-27· cited 27×
• State v. TOMAS D.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-06-01· cited 25×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding
  Supreme Court· 1953-02-09· cited 1,206×
• Lutwak v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1953-03-16· cited 1,108×
• Blain v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1988-09-06· cited 375×
• Lavinder v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1991-07-30· cited 364×
• Brown v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-07-08· cited 39×
• State v. Sepcich
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1985-07-08· cited 27×
• State v. Green
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-03-26· cited 27×
• Scott v. Commonwealth
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-06-17· cited 25×
• Brame v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1996-09-13· cited 20×
• Meek v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-20· cited 1×