Dean ex rel. Vineyard v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding an instruction erroneous because it “served to negate the potential evidentiary value” of certain evidence
• where an erroneous instruction was given, and the court was unable to determine that objecting party was not prejudiced by its inclusion, reversal was mandated
• “[T]he instruction given was an improper statement of the law and was therefore error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).