Dealers Insurance Co. v. Maroone Chevrolet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the fact that a mother exposed a child to a controlled substance during pregnancy does not establish that her rights should be terminated under section 39.806(1)(c)
• holding that past drug use would not support a finding of prospective neglect unless parent had failed to achieve results in a treatment program, and reversing the egregious conduct basis for termination because the trial court had made no findings to support that basis
• “To grant a petition to terminate parental rights, the trial court must find that the Department proved the allegations supporting the termination of parental rights by clear and convincing evidence.”
• \[T]he Department must prove the allegations supporting the termination of parental rights by clear and convincing evidence and must establish that termination of those rights is the least restrictive means of protecting the child from harm.\
• to terminate parental rights under section 39.806(1)(e), “the trial court must find that any provision of services would be futile or that the child would be threatened with harm despite any services provided to the parent”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).