Skip to main content
· 7/28/1994

Deal v. N.C. State University

Citations

  • 336 N.C. 779
  • 447 S.E.2d 419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that our Court has jurisdiction to consider a request for more damages than certified before the contracting officer
  • holding that no superior knowledge claim is stated “where the knowledge of both the government and the bidder is based on data equally available to both parties”
  • stating that legal effect of bidding schedules not nullified automatically by the presence of a Variations in Estimated Quantities clause in the contract.
  • holding government must possess special knowledge that is vital to contract performance, and that is unknown and not reasonably available to the bidder who is thereby misled
  • finding jurisdiction over a claim when “the factual basis of the claim before this court is identical to the claim which was certified to the contracting officer”
  • both suggesting that a claim is defined by the set of operative facts underlying it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.