· 1/29/2008
Deal v. Kegler Brown Hill & Ritter Co. LPA
Citations
- 551 F. Supp. 2d 694
- 43 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1866
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6594
- 2008 WL 269617
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that \[t]he burden is on Defendant to show that the ... Plan is a top hat plan.\
- “The burden is on Defendant to show that the ... Plan is a top hat plan.”
- the court lacked information necessary to determine that the plan at issue was a top hat plan where the defendant provided inaccurate percentages
- parties agreed that the plan was unfunded and for the purpose of providing deferred compensation, but disputed selectivity
- the court also lacked needed information necessary to determine that the plan at issue was a top hat plan where the defendant did not provide all relevant salaries
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gregory L. Frost
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.