Deal v. Bowman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirm ing that in the “vast majority” of cases negligence is for the jury to determine
• “ ‘Only when the facts are such that reasonable men must draw the same conclusion from them does the question of negligence become one of law for the court.’ ”
• breach becomes a legal 18 question for the court \'when the facts are such that reasonable [persons] must draw the same conclusion'\
• “[i]n the vast majority of cases, the question of negligence is a factual determination for the jury, not a legal question for the court”; whether duty has been breached is a question of fact
• “ ‘Only when tlie facts are such that [a] reasonable [person] must draw the same conclusion from them does the question of negligence become one of law for the court.’ ”
• discussing motions for judgment as a matter of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).