De Yoe v. Seattle Electric Co.
Citations
- 53 Wash. 588
- 102 P. 446
- 1909 Wash. LEXIS 1371
Syllabus
<p>Carriers — Injury to Passengers — Street Cars — Sudden Jerks— Presumptions — Res Ipsa Loquitur — Evidence—Sufficiency. There is no presumption of negligence in the starting of a cable car on a steep grade with a sudden jerk, whereby a passenger standing in front was thrown against a window which broke and injured a passenger inside, where jerks in starting were frequent and unavoidable; and there being no other evidence of negligence or any showing as to whether the standing passenger was negligent, a judgment is properly directed for defendant notwithstanding a verdict for the plaintiff.</p> <p>Same. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, as applied to negligence cases, applies only where the accident, in the light of ordinary experience, is inexplicable except as the result of negligence.</p> <p>Rudkin, C. J., Fullerton, Chadwick, and Dunbar, JJ., dissent.</p>
Judges: Crow, Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lewinn v. MurphyWashington Supreme Court· 1911-05-16· cited 18×
- Valentine v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1912-09-04· cited 10×
- Brown v. Crescent Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-07-25· cited 9×
- Wile v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1913-02-08· cited 8×
- Hoopman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1922-11-25· cited 5×
- Toler v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1917-01-26· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mitchell v. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1883-07-02· cited 37×
- President of the Baltimore & Yorktown Turnpike Road v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1890-06-19· cited 35×
- Anderson v. McCarthy Dry Goods Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1908-04-29· cited 30×
- Williams v. Stokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1905-05-22· cited 20×
- Stewart v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1888-05-04· cited 16×
- Holland v. West End Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1892-01-08· cited 10×
- Hoffman v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1899-12-15· cited 5×
- Hayes v. Forty-second Street & Grand Street Ferry RailroadNew York Court of Appeals· 1884-11-25· cited 4×
- Merrill v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1902-07-01· cited 2×
- Needham v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York· 1905-11-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.