Skip to main content
· 11/13/1893

De Wald v. Woog

Citations

  • 158 Pa. 497
  • 27 A. 1088
  • 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1622

Syllabus

<p>Mechanic's Lien — Alterations and repairs — Evidence.</p> <p>A mechanic’s lion cannot be siistained as for work done on a new building, where it appears that the work for which the lien is claimed was done on two adjoining four story buildings each twenty feet wide, that the building was occupied as a restaurant during the whole progress of the work, that the first story front was changed, but that the front of the second, third and fourth stories remained unchanged, although the interior of the buildings was entirely remodeled and the back buildings extended.</p>

Judges: Dean, McCollum, Mitchell, Pee, Thompson, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.