Skip to main content
· 4/27/1903

De Wald v. Ingle

Citations

  • 31 Wash. 616
  • 72 P. 469
  • 1903 Wash. LEXIS 679

Syllabus

<p>EVIDENCE-OPINIONS OP WITNESS-AMOUNT OP DAMAGES.</p> <p>In an action for personal injuries testimony of the plaintiff as to the money value of his damages is inadmissible.</p> <p>APPEAL-EXCEPTIONS TO EVIDENCE-SUPHCIENCY.</p> <p>When a proper exception to the admission of testimony has been tafeen, but overruled by the court, it is sufficient to apply to subsequent errors of the same feind in the examination of the witness, although the question to which specific objection was raised may not have been intelligently and responsively answered.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.