De Vries v. Tower Semiconductor Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because Rule 3al2-3 is not enumerated in § 78y(b), jurisdiction is not governed by the section, but by the APA
• providing that a matter is not within an agency’s primary jurisdiction if it was of the sort that is the “daily fare of federal judges”
• observing that canon against surplusage pertains within single statutory provision, not across provisions
• fourth factor was “simply irrelevant” where “the question presented is not one that the Commission would be expected to decide”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).