D.E. v. Central Dauphin School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prevailing parties can enforce a hearing officer’s favorable decision by bringing a civil action in federal court
• holding that \individuals seeking to enforce a favorable [hearing officer] decision obtained at the administrative level are 'aggrieved' for purposes of the IDEA and may properly pursue such claims in [federal] court.\
• finding that parties seeking enforcement of favorable HOD were aggrieved parties who could bring claim under § 1415(i)(2)(A)
• explaining that the deliberate indifference standard requires more than bureaucratic inaction
• requiring plaintiff seeking to establish deliberate indifference to show “(1) [actual] knowledge that a federally protected right is substantially likely to be violated . . . and (2
• requiring plaintiff seeking to establish deliberate indifference to show “(1) [actual] knowledge that a federally protected right is substantially likely to be violated . . . and (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).