Skip to main content
· 5/31/1932

De Stuers v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 26 B.T.A. 201
  • 1932 BTA LEXIS 1349

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing an order on a motion to shorten time, but not considering whether or holding that an order to shorten time is proper only when a party moves to shorten time
  • examination of related statutes or provisions in the same legislation is appropriate to determine whether meaning is plain
  • examination of related statutes or provisions in the same legislation is appropriate to determine whether meaning is plain
  • where a statute is ambiguous, the court can resort to legislative history and other aids for discerning intent
  • “[I]f the statute’s meaning is plain on its face, then the court must give effect to that plain meaning as an expression of legislative intent.”
  • “[I]f the statute’s meaning is plain on its face, then the court must give effect to that plain meaning as an expression of legislative intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murdock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.