· 5/31/1932
De Stuers v. Commissioner
Citations
- 26 B.T.A. 201
- 1932 BTA LEXIS 1349
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing an order on a motion to shorten time, but not considering whether or holding that an order to shorten time is proper only when a party moves to shorten time
- examination of related statutes or provisions in the same legislation is appropriate to determine whether meaning is plain
- examination of related statutes or provisions in the same legislation is appropriate to determine whether meaning is plain
- where a statute is ambiguous, the court can resort to legislative history and other aids for discerning intent
- “[I]f the statute’s meaning is plain on its face, then the court must give effect to that plain meaning as an expression of legislative intent.”
- “[I]f the statute’s meaning is plain on its face, then the court must give effect to that plain meaning as an expression of legislative intent.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murdock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.