De Soto v. California

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that argument to peg Wisconsin’s statutory interest to “fluctuation^ in market conditions ... is more appropriately addressed to the legislature” (quotation and citation omitted)
• explaining that argument to peg Wisconsin’s statutory interest to “fluctuation[s] in market conditions . . . is more appropriately addressed to the legislature” (quotation and citation omitted)
• noting that where defendant is concerned about 12% postjudgment interest rate, defendant could “protect itself against such a financial burden by simply tendering payment ahead of appeal”
• noting that where defendant is concerned about 12% postjudgment interest rate, defendant could “protect itself against such a financial burden by simply tendering payment ahead of appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).