De Quan Yu v. U.S. Attorney General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Attorney General’s intervening decision “may have dashed [the alien’s] hopes of success but it did not impair any vested right”
• rejecting a similar argument that the BIA erred in retroactively applying an intervening decision of the Attorney General overruling BIA precedent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).