· 5/7/1953
De Pinho Vaz v. Shaughnessy
Citations
- 112 F. Supp. 778
- 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2848
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying motion to compel where the moving party did not attempt to contact its adversary or request a conference with the court
- finding a pro se litigant’s Section 1983 action against a prison superintendent, sergeant, and corrections officer, alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment and due process clause, did not contain “novel or overly complex issues” under Hodge
- denying motion to compel discovery for failure to meet and confer
- “The ‘meet and confer’ requirement embodies a policy of encouraging voluntary resolution of pretrial disputes, in the interest of judicial and client economy and effective processing of cases.”
- denying motion to compel for failure to meet and confer
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dimock
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.