Skip to main content
· 5/7/1953

De Pinho Vaz v. Shaughnessy

Citations

  • 112 F. Supp. 778
  • 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to compel where the moving party did not attempt to contact its adversary or request a conference with the court
  • finding a pro se litigant’s Section 1983 action against a prison superintendent, sergeant, and corrections officer, alleging violations of the Eighth Amendment and due process clause, did not contain “novel or overly complex issues” under Hodge
  • denying motion to compel discovery for failure to meet and confer
  • “The ‘meet and confer’ requirement embodies a policy of encouraging voluntary resolution of pretrial disputes, in the interest of judicial and client economy and effective processing of cases.”
  • denying motion to compel for failure to meet and confer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dimock

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.