De Oca v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding appellant’s patentability arguments that were based on properly rejected claim constructions “nec- essarily fail[ed]”
• “We review the Board’s claim constructions de novo and review any underlying fac- tual determinations for substantial evidence.”
• “We review the Board’s claim constructions de novo and review any underlying fac- tual determinations for substantial evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).