Skip to main content
· 12/9/1980

De Mund v. Lum

Citations

  • 620 P.2d 270
  • 1 Haw. App. 443
  • 1980 Haw. App. LEXIS 163

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that provision of rule requiring that documents forming basis for motion for summary judgment should be either certified or sworn to is mandatory
  • holding that the provision of HRCP Rule 56 requiring that documents must be either certified or sworn to is mandatory
  • recognizing that Rule 56 requires documents to be sworn to or certified

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hayashi, Padgett, Burns

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.