· 12/9/1980
De Mund v. Lum
Citations
- 620 P.2d 270
- 1 Haw. App. 443
- 1980 Haw. App. LEXIS 163
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that provision of rule requiring that documents forming basis for motion for summary judgment should be either certified or sworn to is mandatory
- holding that the provision of HRCP Rule 56 requiring that documents must be either certified or sworn to is mandatory
- recognizing that Rule 56 requires documents to be sworn to or certified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hayashi, Padgett, Burns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.