De Met's Inc. v. Insull

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not an adjudication of the merits”
• “a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not an adjudication of the merits . . . .”
• “[A] dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not an adjudication of the merits, and hence has no [claim preclusive] effect.”
• “dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not an adjudication of the merits, and hence has no res judicata effect.”
• “a dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not an adjudication of the merits . . . .”
• “[A] dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not an adjudication on the merits and hence has no res judicata effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).