Skip to main content
· 5/19/2009

De Mercado v. Mukasey

Citations

  • 566 F.3d 810
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20220
  • 2009 WL 1382915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding the court lacked jurisdiction to review petitioner’s claim that the IJ failed to serve as an impartial adjudicator and denied petitioner a full and fair hearing because it was not raised to the BIA
  • evaluating hardship to a qualifying relative necessarily implicates family unity, and to carve out an exception to lack of jurisdiction would “swallow the rule itself’
  • denial of an application for cancellation of removal does not implicate constitutional rights regarding family unity
  • denial of an application for cancellation of removal does not implicate constitutional rights concerning family unity or child rearing
  • denial of an application for cancellation of removal does not implicate constitutional rights concerning family unity or child rearing
  • claim that IJ failed to serve as an impartial adjudicator and denied petitioner a full and fair hearing was unreviewable because it was not raised to the BIA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, O'Scannlain, Tallman, Pregerson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.