· 5/19/2009
De Mercado v. Mukasey
Citations
- 566 F.3d 810
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 20220
- 2009 WL 1382915
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the court lacked jurisdiction to review petitioner’s claim that the IJ failed to serve as an impartial adjudicator and denied petitioner a full and fair hearing because it was not raised to the BIA
- evaluating hardship to a qualifying relative necessarily implicates family unity, and to carve out an exception to lack of jurisdiction would “swallow the rule itself’
- denial of an application for cancellation of removal does not implicate constitutional rights regarding family unity
- denial of an application for cancellation of removal does not implicate constitutional rights concerning family unity or child rearing
- denial of an application for cancellation of removal does not implicate constitutional rights concerning family unity or child rearing
- claim that IJ failed to serve as an impartial adjudicator and denied petitioner a full and fair hearing was unreviewable because it was not raised to the BIA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson, O'Scannlain, Tallman, Pregerson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.