Skip to main content

De La Rosa v. State

Citations

  • 173 Misc. 2d 1007
  • 662 N.Y.S.2d 921
  • 1997 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 421

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the existing Federal money damage claim recognized” in Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97 (1976
  • explaining that New York State’s constitutional provision prohibiting cruel and unusual punishments is self-executing
  • “[A]n article 78 proceeding must be maintained in Supreme Court, not the Court of Claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.