De La Rama v. De La Rama

Citations

• 241 U.S. 154
• 36 S. Ct. 518
• 60 L. Ed. 932
• 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1788

Syllabus

<p>The rule that local practice, sanctioned by the local courts, should not be disturbed, applied in this case to the union of two causes of action, one of divorce and the other separation of the conjugal property, and both within the jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance of the Philippine Islands.</p> <p>An objection to the competency of the presiding judge which was not made in the courts below, and could have been corrected if made in the trial court, cannot be tolerated in this court except under the most peremptory requirements of law.</p> <p>Due process of law does not forbid a hearing upon a transcript of evidence formerly heard in court; and where, as in this case, the parties assented to the course pursued.</p> <p>As the evidence is not before this court, and there is nothing in the record to control the opinion of the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands that the method adopted by the Court of First Instance was substantially in accord with the method prescribed by the Code, this court disallows an attempt to open questions of detail, no clear and important error being shown and the matter being one of local ■ administration.</p> <p>A discretion is recognized in regard to allowing interest even in matters of tort; and this court will not hold that the court below erred in fixing the date at which, but for the law’s delay, the money would have been paid, even though the appellate court did redüce the amount awarded by the trial court.</p> <p>The review of judgments of this nature of the Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands is by appeal and not by writ of error.</p>