De La Maza v. United States. Samson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “(I)t is well settled that one may stipulate to facts from which jurisdiction may be inferred.”
• “[I]f jurisdiction herein were an issue to be proven factually, it is well settled that one may stipulate to facts from which jurisdiction may be inferred.”
• “After an offense of the laws of the United States was set forth and returned in the indictment, the district court had jurisdiction of . . . the subject matter.”
• while a party cannot stipulate to jurisdiction, “if jurisdiction herein were an issue to be proved factually, it is well settled that one may stipulate to facts from which jurisdiction may be inferred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).