De Jesus v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prosecutor’s comment during closing argument that “[defense counsel] doesn’t think the evidence is enough. That’s her job. She is defending the defendant” did not mandate reversal
• “We think that these comments ... were within the range of appropriate advocacy and therefore not erroneous, much less so beyond the pale as to vitiate the trial entirely and require a new one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-25· cited 9×
• Goodman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-19· cited 8×
• SOANES v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-03-31· cited 5×
• Price v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-05-04· cited 1×
• Boyd v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-08-22· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Eutsey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-04-24· cited 180×
• Bonifay v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-11· cited 62×
• Peterson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-12-05· cited 53×
• Troedel v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1984-12-06· cited 47×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-05· cited 45×
• King v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-02· cited 43×
• McKay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-03· cited 36×
• Alvarez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-01-02· cited 8×
• Heinz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-09· cited 5×
• James v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-10-03· cited 3×
• Mendes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-30· cited 3×