De Hoyos v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “whether the employer owns or does not own the parking lot is immaterial so long as the employer has provided the parking lot for its employees”
• holding that \whether the employer owns or does not own the parking lot is immaterial so long as the employer has provided the parking lot for its employees\
• whether employer owns parking lot immaterial so long as employer has provided the parking lot for its employees
• for purposes of the premises rule, “whether the employer owns or does not own the parking lot is immaterial so long as the employer has provided the parking lot for its employees”
• An employee in jured walking to work from the parking lot is eligible for worker’s compensation. Whether the employer owns the lot is immaterial so long and the employer provided the lot for employees
• snow and ice; “an employee who falls on a parking lot provided by his employer while proceeding to work, we believe, is subjected to hazards to which the general public is not exposed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).