Skip to main content
· 11/22/1978

De Graaff v. De Graaff

Citations

  • 395 A.2d 525
  • 163 N.J. Super. 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring in camera review before disclosure of tax returns in child support litigation
  • discoverable tax returns may be examined in camera and redacted to protect legitimate privacy interests
  • where party in divorce action seeks confidential tax documents of former spouse and the former spouse's new wife, court may excise confidential material while providing relevant information to party seeking discovery
  • where divorce decree required husband to disclose federal income tax returns to former wife, judge should review returns in camera, excise any matters relating to income or finances of present wife and then give return, as redacted, to former wife

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Pressler and King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.