de Garca v. Galvan
Citations
- 55 Tex. 53
Syllabus
<p>1. Fraudulent conveyance.— No third party can question the validity of a conveyance from the husband to the wife, unless he was a creditor of the husband before the conveyance was made, or was a subsequent purchaser without notice.</p> <p>3. Evidence.—The declarations of a husband, introduced in a suit to which the wife is a party, to impeach a conveyance made by him to his wife, when made after the execution of the deed, cannot constitute such proof as to form the basis of a judgment, even though no objection be made at the time of their introduction in evidence. 3. Practice — Evidence.—Unless the ground of objection to the admissibility of evidence be stated when the objection is made, its admission will constitute no cause for reversal, if the evidence would have been admissible under any contingency.</p>
Judges: App, Com, Quinan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.