Skip to main content
· 8/5/1889

De Cazara v. Oreña

Citations

  • 80 Cal. 132
  • 22 P. 74
  • 1889 Cal. LEXIS 875

Syllabus

<p>Quieting Title—Mortgage—Deed Absolute in Form—Condition to Granting Relief — Statute of Limitations. — A mortgagor of land under a deed absolute in form, after the statute of limitations has run against the mortgage debt, cannot have his title quieted against the interest claimed by the mortgagee under the deed, except upon the condition of payment of the debt.</p> <p>Id. — Mortgagee in Possession must Account for Rents and Profits. — The mortgagee, if he has been in possession of the mortgaged premises, or has received the rents and profits, must account for them, or the value of the use and occupation, and credit the same upon the amount of the mortgage debt.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that required statutory findings on deviation of child support must be sufficient so that “we know that the court considered the correct factors in exercising its discretion”
  • noting that it is well-settled that the written findings required under OCGA § 19-6-15 (i) (1) (B) are “mandatory”
  • holding that “absent some indication to the contrary, we presume that the court followed the directive of § 19-6-2(a)(1) to consider the financial circumstances of both parties as a part of its determination of the amount of attorney[] fees, if any, to be allowed against either party”
  • written findings are mandatory under the revised child support guidelines

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beatty

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.