Skip to main content
· 11/18/2008

De Castro v. Durrell

Citations

  • 671 S.E.2d 244
  • 295 Ga. App. 194
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3749
  • 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 1291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that the subdivision lot owners did not have an implied easement or easement by estoppel to a soccer field located in the subdivision since the recorded subdivision plat did not reflect that the field was a common recreational area
  • deeming an enumeration of error abandoned where the appellant failed to cite any legal authority in support thereof
  • deeming an enumeration of error abandoned where the appellant 1 Dukes references Finley v. State, 286 Ga. 47 (685 SE2d 258) (2009
  • deeming an enumeration of error abandoned where the appellant failed to cite any legal authority in support thereof
  • deeming an enumeration of error abandoned where the appellant failed to cite any legal authority in support thereof
  • trial court did not err in denying motion to compel the production of 77 documents as protected by the attorney-client privilege or not reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikell, Smith, Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.