De Busk v. Harvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a case removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, that the district court had properly denied the plaintiff’s motion to remand based on “[t]he uncontroverted affidavits of appellees, attached as exhibits to the amended petition for removal”
• holding, in a case removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, that the district court had properly denied the plaintiff’s motion to remand based on “[t]he uncontroverted affidavits of appellees, attached as exhibits to the amended petition for removal”
• holding, in a case removed under 28 U.S.C. § 1442, that the district court had properly denied the plaintiff’s motion to remand based on “[t]he uncontroverted affidavits of appellees, attached as exhibits to the amended petition for removal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).