De Anza Land and Leisure Corp. v. Raineri

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a statutory bar to enforcement of the debt is not equivalent to its extinguishment
• holding that the statute of limitations for an action to foreclose a mortgage is the same as for an action on the underlying debt: “A.R.S. § 12-548 applies to foreclosure actions as well as to actions on the underlying debt”
• “A.R.S. § 12-548 applies to foreclosure actions as 1 well as to actions on the underlying debt”
• “It is well established that in order to remove the applicable statute of limitations, ‘there must be both (a) an acknowledgment of the debt, and (b) willingness to pay it.’”
• “We 4 also note that the promise to pay may be implied.”
• “We also note that the promise to pay may be 18 implied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).