DCV Holdings, Inc. v. ConAgra, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when contract terms conflict, more specific terms control over general terms
• “[W]here specific and general provisions conflict, the specific provision ordinarily qualifies the meaning of the general one.”
• “[W]here specific and general provisions conflict, the specific provision ordinarily qualifies the meaning of the general one.”
• “[W]here specific and general provisions conflict, the specific provision ordinarily qualifies the meaning of the general one.”
• “Specific language in a contract controls over general language, and where specific and general provisions conflict, the specific provision ordinarily qualifies the meaning of the general one.”
• “Specific language in a contract controls over general language, and where specific and general provisions conflict, the specific provision ordinarily qualifies the meaning of the general one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).