Dch Regional Medical Center v. Burwell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff must show that “the protected activity was the but-for cause of the adverse action,” not merely “a but-for cause”
• holding that the plaintiff must show that “the protected activity was the but-for cause of the adverse action,” not merely “a but-for cause”
• holding that the plaintiff must show that “the protected activity was the but-for cause of the adverse action,” not merely “a but-for cause”
• holding that the plaintiff must show that “the protected activity was the but-for cause of the adverse action,” not merely “a but-for cause”
• noting that the protected activity must be the but-for cause of the alleged adverse employment action
• explaining that factors other than a protected activity can contribute to bringing an adverse action, but that a plaintiff must still show that the action would not have been taken had he or she not complained of unlawful discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).