D.C. Metropolitan Police Dep't v. D.C. Public Employee Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a visa denial may implicate the First Amendment right of U.S. citizens
• recognizing citizen audience had First Amendment interest in listening to communist agitator, but accepting government’s exclusion of alien speaker despite this interest
• noting that Congress has plenary control over admission and exclusion of aliens
• discussing the “First Amendment right to receive information and ideas” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that “prisoners have some First Amendment rights in receiving mail”
• noting the “variety of contexts [in which] this Court has referred to a First Amendment right to receive information and ideas”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).