D.B. Zwirn Special Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. Tama Broadcasting, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that such a provision “strongly supported” the appointment of a receiver
• remanding case for lack of federal-question jurisdiction after concluding that, “[a]t its core, this is a state law breach of contract action”
• shifting 3 the burden to the opposing party to demonstrate why a receiver should not be appointed in 4 spite of their prior authorization
• setting forth the contractual provision on appointment of temporary receiver, including language regarding consent
• “Although plaintiff does not allege that Tama has engaged in any fraudulent conduct, this Court has appointed receivers even where there was no evidence of fraud.”
• appointing a receiver without any evidence of fraud

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).