D.B. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the collateral-order doctrine enables appellate courts to review “a district court order denying a motion to permissively intervene”
• holding that “every part of every brief filed to influence a judicial decision qualifies as a ‘judicial record’” (citing MetLife, Inc. v. Financial Stability Oversight Council, 865 F.3d 661 (D.C. Cir. 2017)
• finding that “every part of every brief filed to influence a judicial decision qualifies as a ‘judicial record’”
• noting that “every part of every brief filed to influence a judicial decision qualifies as a ‘judicial record’”
• finding that “every part of every brief filed to influence a judicial decision qualifies as a ‘judicial record’”
• noting that there may be an exception from treatment as a judicial record “for material inserted into a court filing in bad faith”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).