DB 232 Seigel Mezz LLC v. Moskovits

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an appellate court may affirm the district court on any basis fairly presented in the record
• noting that the witness had an “unobstructed” view of the robber “at close range” “for approximately twelve seconds”
• noting that such knowledge “may be shown entirely through circumstan- tial evidence”
• finding no unconstitutional search where purse carried by arrestee was 14 searched incident to and contemporaneously with the arrest
• “[0]nce an' item ... has been lawfully seized and searched, subsequent searches of that'item, so long as it remains in the legitimate uninterrupted possession of the police, may be conducted without a warrant.”
• “The majority of previous cases in which the courts have upheld a finding of abandonment have involved both a denial of ownership or interest in the property and a physical relinquishment of the property.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).