Daytona Rescue Mission, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the City’s interest in regulating homeless shelters and food banks is a compelling interest”
• holding that “the City’s interest in regulating homeless shelters and food banks is a compelling interest”
• holding that “the City’s interest in regulating homeless shelters and food banks is a compelling interest”
• rejecting a church's Free Exercise and RFRA claims under similar circumstances
• no substantial burden because prohibited practice not mandated by plaintiff’s faith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).