Dayton Tire and Rubber Co. v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Wait Court “imposed a strict duty to adequately warn the consumer of a product’s dangerous propensities when that product by its very nature, free of defect, is dangerous”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).