Dayton Newspaper, Inc. v. Department of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Limiting a search by applying a cut-off date, without providing notice of the date to the requester, renders the search unreasoanble.”
• ordering agency to conduct a supplemental search through the date of the agency’s final decision on the plaintiffs’ 31 FOIA request because, “at that point, Plaintiffs were put on notice that the [agency] was no longer searching for records”
• “[TJhere has to be a temporal deadline for documents that satisfy [a FOIA] request. This deadline is often referred to as the cut-off date.... [A] reasonable cut-off date is the date of the [agency's] final decision.” (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).