Days Inns Worldwide, Inc. v. Lincoln Park Hotels, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting plaintiff over $150,000 in attorneys’ fee where defendants “willfully violated the Lanham Act.”
• “[Because the admitted facts show that Defendant violated the [DTPA], Defendant has also violated [the ICFA].”
• defendants admitted confusion at least in part because purpose of motion was to shift blame to another defendant and in any event dispositive issue was lack of evidence, not admissions
• “[S]ince we have granted DIW’s motion for summary judgment on all of its breach of contract claims, DIW’s unjust enrichment claim is dismissed as moot since DIW has been provided with a recovery on its breach of contract causes of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).